Skip to content
Case study · Fintech and crypto

Payments fintech: recovering an undocumented legacy platform and ending its silent failures

KINTO stabilized an undocumented legacy payments platform and took failing user approvals to zero errors in the observation window, with alerts that fire within minutes.

By KINTO · Published

Figures, each with its source

  • failing → zero in the window

    user approval errors

    Measured

  • 15–30 minutes

    detection time with new alerts

    Measured

Ranges or orders of magnitude where a figure could identify the client, each with its source.

How the transformation unfolded From the problem to what changed, in the five steps every KINTO case follows.
  1. Problem

    A payments platform inherited from a previous developer had no documentation.

  2. Signals

    Four signals: market, business, user experience and support.

  3. How we understood it

    We audited the cloud infrastructure, verified the code was identical to production, identified fragile dependencies and found the root cause of the failures with targeted queries and telemetry.

  4. What we built

    Graceful degradation so approval always persists, a sign-in fix, observability with alerts, a runbook with idempotent deployment and rollback, and a migrated company website.

  5. Transformation

    Sign-in went from error to correct response, failing user approvals went to zero errors in the observation window (deployed on the first try), and silent failures became alerts within 15–30 minutes.

Before and after, by dimension Editorial levels from 0 to 4 read from the text of this case, never a figure drawn to scale.
  • Platform code

    Before

    Undocumented (level 0 of 4)

    After

    Versioned and documented (level 4 of 4)

  • User approval

    Before

    Failing (level 1 of 4)

    After

    No errors in the window (level 3 of 4)

  • Failure detection

    Before

    Reported by users (level 1 of 4)

    After

    Alerts within minutes (level 4 of 4)

  • Third-party outage

    Before

    Half-made accounts (level 1 of 4)

    After

    Pending, recovered later (level 3 of 4)

The four signals we read What the market, the business, the user experience and support were saying before KINTO built anything.
  • Market

    International payments in its segment are still handled with manual transfers, email and spreadsheets.

  • Business

    The platform depended on third-party services whose outages dragged entire processes down.

  • User experience

    Approved users could not use their dashboard.

  • Support

    Errors arrived as user reports; with low traffic and no alerts, failures went unnoticed.

From root cause to graceful degradation
  1. Infrastructure audit Inventory, network, costs
  2. Code inventory Verified identical to production
  3. Root cause Targeted queries and telemetry
  4. Graceful degradation Approval always persists

Connections

  • Infrastructure audit → Code inventory
  • Code inventory → Root cause
  • Root cause → Graceful degradation

KINTO stabilized an undocumented legacy payments platform and took failing user approvals to zero errors in the observation window, with alerts that fire within minutes.

Problem

A payments platform inherited from a previous developer had no documentation. Failures were silent: user sign-in broke, and account approval left accounts half-created. The company website also had to be migrated.

Signals

  • Market: International payments in its segment are still handled with manual transfers, email and spreadsheets.
  • Business: The platform depended on third-party services whose outages dragged entire processes down.
  • User experience: Approved users could not use their dashboard.
  • Support: Errors arrived as user reports; with low traffic and no alerts, failures went unnoticed.

How we understood it

  • Cloud infrastructure audit (inventory, network, costs) with prioritized findings.
  • Code inventory, verified identical to what ran in production.
  • Dependency review: the platform carried fragile dependencies; stabilizing it came before evolving it.
  • Root cause from data: targeted queries and telemetry showed that third-party outages propagated unchecked into sign-in and approval.

What we built and why

  • Graceful degradation: approval always persists and is marked “pending” if a third party is down; accounts are recovered later through an idempotent, protected process. Providers are switchable by configuration.
  • Sign-in fix without breaking access, plus front-end guards.
  • Observability: logging turned on and alerts for the failures that matter.
  • Runbook and idempotent deployment with backup, verification and rollback; new tests; documentation and a phased roadmap.
  • Company website migrated.

Why this way: When a third party goes down, approval should stay “pending” and be recovered later by an idempotent process instead of leaving accounts half-made; and failures should raise their own alerts.

Transformation

  • Sign-in from error to correct response, validated end to end.

  • Failing user approvals to zero errors in the observation window; deployed on the first try.

  • From silent failures to alerts in 15–30 minutes.

  • From an undocumented platform to versioned, documented code.

  • user approval errors: failing → zero in the window (measured)

  • detection time with new alerts: 15–30 minutes (measured)

What we don’t know yet

  • Validation with real users at close and the new site’s metrics: no evidence.
Case studies

Related case studies

Fintech and crypto

Agentic websites

Fintech and crypto: websites where trust is built with clarity, not promises

Several fintech and crypto companies in Latin America and the US received bilingual sites from KINTO with segment landing pages, extensive FAQs and a layer that helps generative search engines cite them correctly.

Latin America, United States Read the case study

Have a problem like this?

Tell KINTO what is going on. The first conversation is to understand it, not to sell.