KINTO takes on rescues where nobody fully knows what runs, what depends on what or which version is live.
The problem
Rescue cases have a common shape: the platform works until it does not, and nobody can say why. A payments platform inherited from a previous developer had no documentation and failures nobody saw: sign-in returned an error, and approving users left accounts half-created. A hosting agency’s sites were duplicated across legacy infrastructure, and nobody knew which version of each site was live. A store went down whenever bots crawled its filter URLs.
How KINTO approaches it
- Diagnose first. Inventory, network and costs, and an analysis of what actually runs. In the hosting case that meant classifying every domain automatically and reconciling DNS and registrars.
- Stabilize. For the failing store, the old site was stabilized within days before any migration began.
- Migrate in waves. Each wave moves a group of sites or modules, with the rollback ready. The hosting migration ran wave by wave to a new server and static hosting, with no server where none is needed.
- Degrade gracefully. If a third party fails, approval stays pending and an idempotent process completes it later, instead of leaving half-made records.
- Make failure visible. Logging on, alerts for the failures that matter, and a runbook with idempotent deployment and rollback.
What the system never does
- It never changes production before the diagnosis is done.
- It never drops email or URLs silently.
- It never leaves a half-made record when a dependency is down.
- It never ships without a rollback path.
Who it is for
Companies with a platform they depend on but cannot fully explain: legacy code, undocumented integrations, repeated incidents or a migration they keep postponing. Open items are stated: in the payments case, validation with real users at close still has no evidence.